Clay services
Engagement
90-day rolling
Team
Dedicated pod per practice
Clay status
Studio Partner
Entry point
Free Clay diagnostic
What it is
Clay data enrichment takes a thin record, a company domain or a name, and fills in the rest from a marketplace of third-party data sources, then writes the result wherever you need it. We describe Clay as your enrichment brain, built to enrich, scrape and automate across 150+ data sources. The useful part is not any single provider. It is that Clay queries them in sequence and keeps the first good answer.
What gets enriched. Firmographics (company-level facts: employee count, industry, funding stage, technologies in use), contact data (verified work email, direct title, seniority) and signals (a hiring spike, a funding round, a new tool detected on the site). Firmographics are usually the most dependable layer. Contact data and signals vary more by provider and segment, so they need verification before anyone acts on them.
Where the output goes. A Clay table is a staging area, not a destination. The record has to land in the CRM, on the right object, in a field that reporting already uses. That is what lets you report on enriched data next to everything else.
What Clay is not. It is not a database you rent and it is not an outbound agency. It does not decide who to target or what to say. Our own framing still holds: Clay itself won’t help you grow, but when used right, it multiplies everything around it.
You can see a Clay enrichment build end to end in our docs.
How it works
Instead of asking one data provider and accepting whatever comes back, a waterfall asks them in a ranked order. Provider one runs. If it returns a verified email, the sequence stops and you pay for one lookup. If it returns nothing, provider two runs, then provider three. Conditional rules sit between the steps so a lookup only fires when it can succeed, for example skipping a personal-email provider when the domain is a known catch-all (a domain that accepts mail for any address, so no single address can be confirmed).
The cheapest provider first looks efficient and is not, because a miss still costs a credit and then you pay again downstream. Order by measured match rate on your own ICP, then by cost.
Most wasted spend comes from lookups that never had a chance: enriching records already enriched this quarter, chasing direct dials for a segment that never answers, or verifying an address on a catch-all domain.
An unverified email that reaches the CRM costs more than a blank field, because a rep works it, it bounces, and the sender reputation pays for it.
What we build
Build the account universe first: every company that matches the ICP, enriched, deduplicated and scored, held in one table that both sales and marketing read from. Output: a ranked target list the team agrees on, not three competing spreadsheets.
Enrichment triggers on an event rather than a calendar: a funding round, a relevant hire, a tool appearing or disappearing from the stack. Output: sequences that fire on a reason, with the reason written into the record so the rep can see it.
A form fill arrives with an email and a company name. Within seconds the record carries firmographics, a score, an owner and a route. Output: inbound leads that reach the right rep the same minute, which is where most of the revenue leakage in this category sits.
Churn-risk signals pushed to customer success, territory and capacity data for planning, competitor-displacement triggers. Output: whatever the practice pod and your team scope together in the diagnostic.
Why the CRM matters
The failure mode nobody writes about. The enrichment works, the table fills, and nothing changes. The data landed in a custom field no report reads, overwrote a value sales trusted, or arrived on a lead record that routing never assigned. The team concludes Clay does not work. Clay worked; the system around it did not.
What has to be true before enrichment helps. Field-level ownership, so there is one source of truth per attribute and a documented rule for which system wins a conflict. A lead source taxonomy (the fixed list of values that records where a lead came from) that survives enrichment overwriting it. Stage and lifecycle definitions that mean the same thing to everyone. Deduplication rules that run before the write, not after.
Data decays, so this is an operating job and not a project. B2B contact data degrades continuously, which is why enrichment needs a refresh cadence and a monitoring view rather than a launch date. Someone has to watch match rates, credit burn and write errors every week.
Why an embedded operator is the right shape for this. LeanScale works inside your systems with your team, as embedded operators rather than advisors. The same pod that builds the Clay waterfall owns the CRM fields it writes into, across four practices: Revenue Operations, Marketing Operations, Growth Operations and Financial Operations. A tool reseller hands you a Clay table and leaves. An agency that only advises hands you a roadmap.
See how our embedded pods work.
Cost
Clay bills in credits, every enrichment step consumes them, and a deeper waterfall costs more per record. The variable that decides your bill is not the plan. It is how many lookups you fire that never had a chance of returning a match.
The usual waste comes from three patterns, each a condition that should have gated a step:
Clay’s own pricing page carries the current tiers (see Clay’s current pricing), and your real cost depends on waterfall depth and volume. We size it with you in the diagnostic.
Keep the two bills separate. Clay’s platform cost is paid to Clay, and LeanScale’s fee is a separate subscription.
How we work
We run Clay as part of our data enrichment services on a subscription, on a 90-day rolling basis, with a dedicated pod per practice. There is no long-term contract.
The entry point is the free Clay diagnostic: no cost and no pitch. You get a read on your current Clay setup or your readiness for one, the waterfalls worth building first, and what in the CRM has to change before enrichment helps.
FAQ
Clay queries a marketplace of third-party data providers in a sequence you define and keeps the first verified answer, then writes it wherever you point it. It covers firmographics, contact data and signals. The value is the sequencing and the automation around it rather than any one data source.
From a marketplace of third-party providers rather than one proprietary database, which is why coverage varies by segment and geography. You choose which providers sit in your waterfall and in what order. That choice is what determines your match rate and your cost.
For a B2B SaaS team that wants one enrichment layer across many providers and full control of the logic, Clay is the strongest option on the market today, which is why we are a Clay Studio Partner. If you need a single-provider API with sub-second response for a product feature, a direct provider integration can fit better. The right answer depends on whether you are enriching for GTM workflows or for an application.
They solve different problems. Apollo bundles its own database with a sales-engagement layer, so it is one vendor end to end. Clay is an orchestration layer that sits above many data providers, including ones Apollo does not carry, and writes into systems you already own. Teams that outgrow a single bundled database usually move toward orchestration.
Often yes, and not as a replacement. Clay can keep your existing provider as the first step in the waterfall and only pay for a second lookup when the first misses, which usually raises coverage without doubling spend.
Clay bills in credits and your spend depends on waterfall depth, volume and how many lookups you gate. Clay’s own pricing page carries the current plan tiers. We size the likely credit consumption with you in the diagnostic before anything is built.
We work in Salesforce, HubSpot or your CRM of choice. Enrichment is only useful if it writes into the system your team already runs on, so switching is not a prerequisite.
A ranked list of data providers that run one after another until one returns a good answer. It raises match rate compared with asking a single provider, and it costs more per record the deeper it goes.
The same pod that builds it. Data decays and providers change their coverage, so match rates, credit burn and write errors need watching every week. That ongoing operation is the subscription, not a hand-off.
We are operators rather than advisors, working inside your systems with your team, and the pod that builds the Clay waterfall also owns the CRM fields it writes into. An implementation partner configures the tool and leaves. The fix for most broken enrichment is in the CRM, not in Clay.
Customer proof
LeanScale is rated 4.9 out of 5 from 33 G2 reviews, and we have been a Clay Studio Partner since 2024.
We have worked with 100+ growth-stage B2B SaaS companies, including Mistral AI, Chainguard, AssemblyAI, Clio, factory.ai, Anrok and Integrate.io, backed by Lightspeed, a16z, General Catalyst, Insight Partners, Bessemer, Updata and Sapphire. Read the case studies.
Selected customers
Mistral AI
Chainguard
AssemblyAI
Clio
Fountain
RunPod
Factory.ai
Ocrolus
Anrok
Act-On
GreyNoise
Integrate.io
CallRail
Patlytics
SpyCloud
Scandit
Coactive
wealth.com
OpenArt
OnBoardCUSTOMER REVIEW · G2
MANAGER, REVOPS
“They combine strategic RevOps thinking with hands-on execution, not just high-level recommendations. They help us actually design, document, and implement the systems we need.”
4.9 / 5
CUSTOMER REVIEW · G2
DIRECTOR, GROWTH MARKETING
“They operate as true thought partners, with a strong point of view on AI-driven RevOps and a clear understanding of how to optimize within complex tech stacks.”
Get started
No cost and no pitch. We look at what you have running in Clay today, or what you should build first if you are starting, and tell you what has to change in the CRM for any of it to pay off.
Powering startups backed by the biggest VCs in tech
